Page 29 - JDPA Volume 02, Issue 02
P. 29

Journal of Defence & Policy Analysis          Volume 02, Issue 02, December 2023


             disturbance, irrespective of their accuracy. Prohibitions on expressions of erro-
             neous opinions or interpretations of past events are not permissible under the
             Covenant.

             However, the freedom of expression is not absolute. Restrictions must adhere to
             specific criteria outlined in Article 19(3) of the Covenant and may not go beyond
             what is permissible under international law. Additionally, Article 20(2) of the
             Covenant mandates the prohibition of propaganda for war or advocacy of ha-
             tred that incites discrimination, hostility, or violence, further emphasizing the
             need for a careful balance between freedom of expression and protection against
             harmful speech.


             Moreover, Articles 21 of the UDHR and 25 of the Covenant underscore the right to
             participate in public affairs, which necessitates the free flow of information and
             ideas about public and political issues. This includes a free press and unrestricted
             media capable of informing public opinion without censorship. While these le-
             gal frameworks were not explicitly designed to combat disinformation, they can
             effectively mitigate its spread when applied within the confines of legitimate re-
             striction grounds outlined in Article 19(3) of the Covenant.

             The Rabat Plan of Action provides useful guidance in this regard, the six factors
             outlined in the Rabat Plan of Action on the prohibition of advocacy of national,
             racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility
             or violence, can provide helpful guidance.

             These include:
                   1. The context of the statement,
                   2. The status of the speaker,
                   3. The intent to incite the audience against a target group,
                   4. The content and form of the expression,
                   5. The extent of its dissemination and
                   6. The likelihood of harm.

             State approaches to address disinformation


             Addressing the multifaceted phenomenon of disinformation is a daunting chal-
             lenge in today’s interconnected world. With the rise of digital platforms and the
             ease of sharing information, the spread of false or misleading content has become
             pervasive, impacting societies on a global scale. Tackling this complex issue re-
             quires a comprehensive approach that addresses the root causes of disinforma-
             tion while promoting transparency, access to reliable information, media free-
             dom, and digital literacy.






             Faculty of Defence and Strategic Studies, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka
                                                                                        19
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34